Steam Fire Engine at Chicago

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The citizens of Chicago have introduced a new steam fire engine, built by Messrs. Sils-by, Mynderse &. Co., of Seneca Falls, N. Y., like the one illustrated on page 73, Vol. XII, SCIENTIFIC AMHKICAN. It is named in honor of Hon. " Long John " Wentworth. The Chicago press has favorable notices of its performance. With forty pounds of steam pressure, four streams were thrown through 100 feet of hose, with six-eighth inch nozzles, 150 feet horizontally; with sixty pounds, through the same length hose, with one-and-a-half inch nozzles, two streams 160 feet horizontally. No attempt was made to change the hose or nozzles after the playing commenced, as a pause of even a few minutes would have rendered the hose useless, by freezing. The full capacity of the machine was thus not called out, but was effectually indicated. The weight of the machine is about five tons, and the cost was $5,000. Much reading makes a full man; much speaking, a ready man; much writing, an exact man.—Bacon.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 26This article was published with the title “Steam Fire Engine at Chicago” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 26 (), p. 206
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican03061858-206b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe