Steamboat Inspectors

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


We understand that the Steamboat Inspectors for this District, of which R. L. Stevens is Chief Superintendent, and H. B. Renwick, formerly of the Patent Office, Engineering Inspector, have not been so [strict in making the owners of steamboats come up to the requirements of the New Act, as they should have been. The law should have gone intq full force in this District on the first ol last March, and all the steamboats had plenty of time to be fully prepared in every respect to" meet those requirements, and yet the majority of them, we are positive are not yet prepared to meet them. The Inspectors have complained of an inadequacy of foice, this! evil should be remedied, but we humbly believe, they have been too free and easy, with the proprietors of many steamboats. There never was a fault committed, nor a duty left impels formed, for which some excuse was not offered. In cases of life and death on steamboats, let the Inspectors remember, thai) they are now held as responsible—the most responsible oi all—for accidents connected with carelessness of Engineers, worm-eaten hulls, defective boilers, want of life boats, preservers, &c.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 46This article was published with the title “Steamboat Inspectors” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 46 (), p. 365
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican07301853-365d

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe