New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Stem Cells Patch Holes in Brain without Prompting

New research finds that stem cells repair and reinforce brain cells in mice

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In research that could be harnessed to speed recovery from stroke or blunt-force trauma to the head, scientists at the University of California, San Francisco, report that mice genetically engineered to have holes in a region of their brain recovered due to the work of stem cells in the area. The findings will be published in the December 15 issue of the journal Cell.

Principal investigator Yuh-Nung Jan and his team developed a mutant line of mice that, upon receiving an injection just after birth, did not develop the genes Numb and Numblike in their brains' subventricular zones (SVZ), an area along the lateral wall of the lateral ventricles (two cavities) that are part of the brain's main communication hub. Jan previously determined that Numb, in drosophila fruit flies, played a role in the development of stem cells into neurons. Jan was not entirely sure, however, what role Numb and functionally related Numblike performed in the mammalian brain. By knocking out these genes, they were able to study their function.

When Jan autopsied some of his mutant mice one to two weeks after their birth, the mice had enlarged ventricles. "As it turned out," Jan says, "these proteins are very important for the integrity of the cellular junctions formed between the ependymal cells," which are cells that make up the ventricles' external lining. Not only were there essentially holes in the brains of these mice after two weeks, but the animals also showed noticeable disruptions in their growth cycles. In addition, according to Jan, "SVZ stem cells produce neuroblasts, [dividing cells that develop into nerve cells or neurons], that migrate to the mouse olfactory bulbs, and, when the SVZ was injured, these mice had smaller olfactory bulbs." Jan's group expected these mice to begin dying off at any moment.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But, they persisted.

By six weeks of age, the mice missing Numb and Numblike, had bigger olfactory bulbs and their growth had normalized significantly. When researchers examined the SVZs of these mice, they discovered that the ependymal cells of the ventricles had been jury-rigged together. After examining the replacement cells, the researchers found that they had developed the Numb protein. Apparently, "some of these SVZ stem cells escaped Numb deletion because of an imperfection in our genetic manipulation," Jan says. And "these escaper stem cells mediated the subsequent repair."

Jan's team believes the mechanism behind the rebuilding of these cells in their mouse models may one day be applied to treat neurological damage due to stroke or trauma in the human brain; after all, the cellular components and proteins are all present in humans. The next step is to determine how these stem cells sense damage and then begin to work on the injured tissue. "If we can figure out how this happens, and determine that it occurs in human neural stem cells," says Chay T. Kuo, a researcher in Jan's lab, "we may be able to increase the effect and harness it for therapeutic use."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe