Still No Signal from Missing Comet-Hunter CONTOUR

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Scientists in NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) continue to monitor the skies for signs of the missing $159-million CONTOUR spacecraft. But with still no communication from the comet-hunting probe as of Tuesday afternoon, it is looking less and less likely that the mission can be saved.

Launched July 3, CONTOUR was designed to explore the centers of comets--the most numerous large bodies in the solar system--which formed billions of years ago as the planets were taking shape. Its itinerary included flybys within 100 kilometers of the comets Encke and Schwassmann-Wachmann3 (both members of Jupiter's family of comets) in 2003 and 2006, respectively. CONTOUR spent more than a month circling Earth and on August 15, the spacecraft's rocket motor was scheduled to fire and blast the probe out of our planet's orbit. But 45 minutes after the burn, an expected signal to NASA's Deep Space Network of radio antennas failed to arrive. Additional bad news came the following day when several observatories recorded telescope images showing two objects traveling along CONTOUR's predicted path--indications that the spacecraft may have broken in two. The scientists could not determine how big the objects were, however, so they remain hopeful that CONTOUR is largely intact. "We realize the possibilities are small, but we can't discount the idea that the spacecraft is still operable," Mission Director Robert Farquhar of the APL said late Monday. "We have to determine that before we give up."

If it is still operative, CONTOUR should be close to completing a 60-hour-long attempt to transmit a signal to Earth through three of its four antennas. This sequence is scheduled to begin 96 hours after CONTOUR receives its last command. But because it is unclear what commands the craft received late last week, the 96-hour period could have ended any time between 4:09 a.m. (EDT) and 10:09 p.m (EDT) on Monday. And even if CONTOUR is functioning properly, scientists on the ground may not know it. "It may be difficult to hear anything because, depending on the spacecraft's position and condition, the antennas might not have a direct line of sight toward Earth," says CONTOUR Mission Operations Manager Mark Holdridge. If no signal is detected by the end of the week, NASA plans to resume searching for the craft in late December, when its antennas may be more favorably positioned.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe