Stomach-Purging Weight-Loss Device Draws Backlash against FDA Approval

Controversial device uses a tube implanted into the abdomen to drain food after eating

x-ray image of a stomach

Critics are urging the Food and Drug Administration to reverse its decision, saying the device mimics, promotes and could lead to potentially life-threatening disorders such as bulimia and binge-eating.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Ben Gruber

DELRAY BEACH, Fla. (Reuters) - Lotta Bosnyak takes extra time to chew the blueberries in her yogurt. Otherwise, she said, the device she credits with saving her life will not work.

The tube Bosnyak is referring to has been implanted into her stomach. She turns a valve and, standing over a toilet, drains out the yogurt.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The 52-year-old Delray Beach, Florida, resident was one of the first people to try the "AspireAssist" device four years ago in Sweden, where she is from.

"It's one of the best ways to change your relationship to food because it does require a lot of work on the patient's part," said Dr. Christopher Thompson, director of therapeutic endoscopy at Brigham Woman's Hospital in Boston.

"It's not just a procedure that's done and then they're off and they don't think about it anymore," he added.

The device, made by Pennsylvania-based biomedical company AspireBariatrics, was approved for use in the United States in June.

However, critics are urging the Food and Drug Administration to reverse its decision, saying the device mimics, promotes and could lead to potentially life-threatening disorders such as bulimia and binge-eating.

"This will likely prove to be yet another in a long line list of misguided, unsuccessful and dangerous products for losing weight," wrote Dr. Eva Trujillo, president of the Academy of Eating Disorders, in a draft of a letter to be submitted the FDA next week.

"Such a device may carry very serious physical and mental health consequences, including life-threatening situations, and should not be approved by the FDA," said the draft, which Reuters saw.

An FDA spokeswoman said the agency approved the AspireAssist because 12-month clinical trial data provided by the manufacturer demonstrated that the device offered a reasonable assurance of safety and efficacy. She did not comment on the letter because the agency had not received it.

Advocates of the device say it is less invasive and more cost-effective than bariatric surgeries and a powerful new weapon in the global fight against obesity.

"There is absolutely no medical evidence to suggest the use of this device could lead to an eating disorder," said Dr. Shelby Sullivan, director of bariatric endoscopy at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, where the device has been tested.

"This isn't the cold or the flu," she added. "Obesity is a chronic disease that needs chronic treatment."

AspireBariatrics Chief Executive Officer Kathy Crothall said the treatment, including the device placement, lifestyle counseling, monitoring, and follow-up, should cost $8,000 to $13,000 for the first year, depending on where the procedure takes place.

"That is three times less than the average weight-loss surgery," Crothall said.

In the United States alone, 35 percent of the population is obese, a condition connected to heart disease, strokes, certain cancers and type 2 diabetes.

Bosnyak lost 150 pounds and rid herself of hypertension and diabetes over a year of using the device.

The Academy of Eating Disorders will keep trying to persuade the FDA to reverse its approval, saying the device sets a dangerous precedent. It said the agency had agreed to meetings with critics in the near future.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe