New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Stop and Smell the Flowers—but Be Ready to Gag [Video]

A two-meter-tall bloom at The New York Botanical Gardens exudes chemicals that mimic rotting flesh to attract pollinators

corpse-flower

What exactly does it smell like? “Like if you cook cabbage and steam it, and then you leave it overnight,” says Lameta Nolan, a vistor to the special event.

Karl J.P. Smith

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

One of the greenhouses at the New York Botanical Garden currently reeks. The culprit is a corpse flower—a plant that blooms as rarely as once a decade and maintains its flower for only about 36 hours. The New York Botantical Garden hasn’t had a corpse flower since 1939. This particular 1.9-meter specimen has been 10 years in the making.

What exactly does it smell like? “Like if you cook cabbage and steam it, and then you leave it overnight,” says Lameta Nolan, a vistor to the special event.

“It smells like a sewer,” says Margo Boy, another brave viewer. “Like New York garbage.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Amorphophallus titanum—which roughly translates to “giant misshapen phallus”—mimics decomposing flesh in order to attract pollinators, says Marc Hachadourian, the director of the Nolen Greenhouses, where the plant resides. “The plant not only looks like rotting meat—in terms of the color of the flower—it smells like it, too. It actually contains some of the same compounds that are present in putrefied flesh and fish. Chemically, it’s almost identical to these terrible smells,” he explains. In fact, the flower produces dimethyl trisulfide (also found in Limburger cheese and cabbage), trimethylamine (normally released by rotting fish and animals), isovaleric acid (a major component of foot odor) and indole (found in human feces).

As ofnoon on Friday the corpse flower was open but its scent was not yet at full potency. As expected, flies were buzzing lazily into and out of the enormous bloom—attracted for the same reasons as the native pollinators, carrion beetles and flesh flies. The flower is quite striking to look at, with a huge potatolike pod, called the spadix, rising out of a frilly and fantastically colored spath, which resembles a petal. “It always creates a sensation wherever this plant blooms,” Hachadourian says. This time was no exception; long lines stretched out of the greenhouse.

View a livestream of the event here.  

About Karl J. P. Smith

Karl J.P. Smith is a AAAS Mass Media Fellow and current PhD candidate in biophysics, computation, and structural biology at the University of Rochester. He is the typewriting storyteller behind the 10 cent story project and is the co-creator of the Bench Warmer's Podcast.

More by Karl J. P. Smith

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe