November 1, 2013
1 min read
Add Us On GoogleAdd SciAmNovember/December Scientific American MIND News Ticker
Lab-grown brains, the ethics of whistle-blowing and irrational pigeons recently made the news.
The Head Lines section of Scientific American MIND's November/December issue mentioned the following articles in brief. Click on the links to learn more about them.
When a wolf leaves its pack, its closest lupine pals are the ones most likely to howl.
Biologists have grown mini brains, akin to that of a nine-week-old fetus, out of stem cells derived from skin.
A computer scientist's interest in stylometry, the study of writing style, helped to unveil J. K. Rowling as the true author of a recent crime novel.
Obsessive-compulsive disorder may have shaped many figures in American history, who in turn shaped the country.
Different brainwide networks of neurons give rise to distinct stages of the creative process.
When a peacock unfurls his tail, peahens look longest at the male's legs and the base of his tail, hardly glancing at the majestic fan of feathers.
People sleep more poorly during a full moon--even when slumbering in a windowless room.
Are whistle-blowers ethical? In one study, baseball fans viewed a player-turned-whistle-blower as more ethical if he was on a rival team--but not the home team.
Even a simple ritual before an activity heightens our enjoyment of the subsequent experience.
Dolphins have signature whistles that may serve as names. They appear to recognize these whistles even after decades of separation.
Pigeons, like humans, can behave irrationally.
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber