Storm Pointer

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


MESSRS. EDITORS—In No. 23, present volume of the Scientific Americau, you published a statement how to make a " Simple Barometer and Storm Pointei," by G. I also saw, in an old German publication, a formula for the same purpose, differing somewhat from the above, as this writer adds camphor, and directs the vial to be hermetically sealed. I have tried both formulas and—failed, the sediment in the vial remaining perfectly quiet at the bottom in all weathers, storm or calm. Will your correspondent, " G.," state why his formula will not act as stated in his article ? Or is there any one among the thousands of readers of the Sci. American who can give more light on the subject? If such, a simple contrivance would indicate changes in the weather, as stated, " twenty-four hours before the tempest ensues," it would certainly be a very desirable and useful instrument. Columbia, Pa. J. B. G. [The only " Storm Pointer " on which we rely is a good barometer.—ED. Dr. J. V. C. Smith, of Boston, says that immense crops of poppies are raised in Switzerland, not for the opium, but for the oil extracted from their seeds. This oil is beautifully transparent, extensively used in house painting, colorless as water, and when mixed with white lead leaves a beautiful surface that never becomes yellow. Now that linseed oil is rising in price, and as much of our land is unfit for the cultivation of flax, he advises the attempt at cultivating the poppy here, which does very well even on poor, sandy soil.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 35This article was published with the title “Storm Pointer” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 35 (), p. 275
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican05141853-275b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe