New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Strange crystals found inside wreckage from the first nuclear bomb test

The Trinity bomb test left behind a unique form of matter, and now scientists have discovered a new chemical structure inside it

A fireball blooms above the site of the nuclear bomb detonation during the Trinity Test.

The fireball from the Trinity nuclear test in New Mexico on July 16, 1945.

Underwood Archives/Contributor/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Almost exactly 81 years ago the first nuclear bomb exploded. In the Trinity test, conducted in the New Mexico desert, a Manhattan Project team detonated a plutonium bomb that released the energy of 25 kilotons of TNT. When the mushroom cloud faded, melted sand combined with vaporized sensor wires to create a weird, glasslike form of matter. Scientists called it trinitite.

Now researchers have identified a new material within trinitite called a clathrate: a cagelike chemical lattice that traps other atoms inside it. “It’s a completely new kind of clathrate crystal—something never seen before in nature or in the products of a nuclear explosion,” says Luca Bindi, a geologist at the University of Florence in Italy, who is a co-author of a study detailing the finding in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA.

A reddish brown rock.

A new clathrate was found in this trinitite sample from the Manhattan Project's bomb blast.

Luca Bindi, Marek Mihalkovič, Michael Widom, Paul J. Steinhardt/PNAS


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The strange material is the result of very unusual conditions. During the Trinity blast, sand swept into the ensuing fireball was exposed to temperatures higher than 1,500 degrees Celsius and pressures of several gigapascals—tens of thousands of times the normal atmospheric pressure and enough to squeeze graphite into diamond. Matter vaporized, mixed and cooled extremely quickly, scrambling into new forms. “This all happened in a matter of seconds, so atoms didn’t have time to arrange into stable structures, leading to unusual nonequilibrium materials like this one,” Bindi says.

The clathrate was found inside a copper-rich metallic droplet embedded in the trinitite. The clathrate’s “cage” shapes are 12-sided dodecahedrons and 14-sided tetrakaidecahedrons made of silicon atoms, with calcium atoms—and sometimes copper and iron atoms—trapped inside.

“The transient extreme conditions of the Trinity test allowed for the formation of metastable phases that might not be found in laboratory experiments,” says G. Nelson Eby, a geoscientist at the University of Massachusetts Lowell, who has previously collaborated with some of the study authors but was not involved in this research. “This is an interesting new addition to the clathrate universe.”

Graphic shows the structure of the clathrate cages made of silicon atoms with calcium atoms trapped inside.

The clathrate variety isn’t the only novel chemistry that has been discovered within trinitite. In 2021 researchers found a quasicrystal—a kind of matter scientists once thought impossible that challenges traditional ideas about how solids form. Quasicrystals have an ordered structure, but their atoms don’t repeat periodically like those in typical crystals. The only other known naturally forming quasicrystal material was found inside meteorite fragments, and scientists think it was created during the fiery collision of two asteroids when the solar system was young.

The quasicrystal seen in trinitite is made of the same four elements—iron, silicon, copper and calcium—that make up the newfound clathrate. And the quasicrystal “is especially intriguing because it formed under the same extreme conditions and still hasn’t been reproduced in the lab, making it a rare example of a structure that nature created but we cannot yet fully replicate,” Bindi says.

The scientists theorize that the two types of crystal formed under the same temperatures and pressures in the blast, but the quasicrystal formed in areas where copper was readily available, whereas clathrate emerged where copper was scarce.

“This work underscores how rare, high-energy events—such as nuclear detonations, lightning strikes, and hypervelocity impacts—serve as natural laboratories for producing unexpected crystalline matter,” the study authors write.

Clara Moskowitz is chief of reporters at Scientific American, where she covers astronomy, space, physics and mathematics. She has been at Scientific American for more than a decade; previously she worked at Space.com. Moskowitz has reported live from rocket launches, space shuttle liftoffs and landings, suborbital spaceflight training, mountaintop observatories, and more. She has a bachelor’s degree in astronomy and physics from Wesleyan University and a graduate degree in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz.

More by Clara Moskowitz
Scientific American Magazine Vol 335 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Bomb Substance” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 335 No. 3 (), p. 12
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican102026-5sd1jD7BfMGUlNSa2w78Pn

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe