Strange Tree Fern Has a Surprisingly Enormous Genome

A new study explores how the flying spider-monkey tree fern might hoard chromosomes

Worm's-eye view of a flying spider monkey tree.

Flying spider-monkey tree fern.

Neil McAllister/Alamy Stock Photo

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Ferns are weird. They're green and leafy like other forest plants, but they reproduce more like mushrooms do—by releasing clouds of spores. Many species don't require a partner for fertilization, unlike most of their seed-bearing cousins. Recent studies estimate ferns split from seed-bearing plants about 400 million years ago.

And fern genomes are bafflingly large. Despite ferns' unique physiology and their relationship to seed plants, however, these strange genomes have been largely neglected by researchers. Until recently, only two (relatively small) fern genomes were fully sequenced, compared with more than 200 flowering plant genomes. Now the first full tree fern genome has been successfully sequenced—that of the flying spider-monkey tree fern—hinting at how these peculiar plants accrued such a massive set of genes.

“If you want to understand the origin of seeds or flowers, ferns are a very important comparison to make,” says Fay-Wei Li, a fern biologist at the Boyce Thompson Institute at Cornell University and co-author on the new study, published in Nature Plants. “But what I really want to know is why the fern genomes are this damn big.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Li's team found that the palm tree–shaped fern has more than six billion DNA base pairs, a billion more than the average genome for flowering plants (humans, by comparison, have about three billion pairs). The new analysis suggests that more than 100 million years ago, an ancestor of this fern duplicated its whole genome—a replication error that is common in plants, Li says.

But it is not clear why tree ferns would keep so much genetic material; most flowering plants return to slimmer genomes after duplications. This species might be hoarding chromosomes, Li says: “I call this the Marie Kondo hypothesis. The chromosomes spark joy for ferns, but they don't spark joy for seed plants.” For plants that reproduce asexually, he says, a large genome can add opportunities for beneficial mutations to occur while buffering from undesirable ones. Ferns are also long-lived, so they evolve more slowly, which may have contributed to the retained genetic material.

Using the fully sequenced genome, the researchers also found which genes build the fern's unusual trunklike stem—a valuable insight into how key traits evolved in stemmed plants, says Jan de Vries, a plant evolutionary biologist at the University of Göttingen in Germany, who was not involved in the study. “Evolution is a tinkerer. Illuminating what workable molecular programs have evolved tells us what is biologically possible and where the constraints are,” he says. “Using this knowledge, we can start tinkering ourselves for synthetic biological purposes.”

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe