Study Deals Blow to Abilities of Adult Stem Cells

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Many ethical and political issues could be averted if adult stem cells prove to be as successful at differentiating into all tissue types in the human body as their embryonic counterparts are. Numerous studies have so far reported success at coaxing adult stem cells into various cell types under different conditions. But a report published online today by the journal Science suggests otherwise. The findings indicate that stem cells cultivated from adult blood may resist change more strongly than previously thought.

Amy J. Wagers and her colleagues at the Stanford University School of Medicine isolated blood-forming stem cells from adult mice in order to test their plasticity. To track the adult stem cells' transformation, the team genetically engineered them to produce a green fluorescing protein that is easily identifiable under a microscope (see image). When mice whose bone marrow had been destroyed by radiation received a single stem cell, green-glowing cells replaced the animals' missing blood and immune cells within a few weeks. A comprehensive search of more than 15 million muscle, brain, liver, kidney, gut and lung cells, however, found only one brain and seven liver cells that appeared green. As a result, the scientists suggest that the capabilities of adult stem cells so far have been overstated. Says Wagers: "It's not to say that nobody should think about adult stem cell plasticity--of course people should look into it--but it's not as robust as it is claimed to be."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American