Study Finds Ethnic Differences in Nicotine Metabolism

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Smoking is a risky habit regardless of an individual¿s ethnicity, but that¿s not to say that everyone responds to it the same way. Indeed, scientists have known for some time that ethnic variations do exist in smoking behavior and lung cancer risk. Now the results of a study appearing in the January 16 issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute add further weight to that assertion. According to the report, Chinese-Americans take in less nicotine per cigarette and metabolize it more slowly than do Latinos or whites, which could help explain why Chinese-Americans have a lower rate of lung cancer than other groups do.

The University of California at San Francisco team that conducted the research studied 131 healthy smokers self-identified as Chinese, Latino and non-Latino whites, to whom they gave injections of labeled nicotine. Blood and urine analyses revealed that the Chinese-American subjects metabolized the nicotine 35 percent more slowly than Latino or white participants did. Also, whereas Latinos smoked fewer cigarettes than whites but took in a comparable amount of nicotine per cigarette smoked, the researchers report, the Chinese-American smokers not only smoked fewer cigarettes, they also took in less nicotine (and therefore less tobacco smoke) than members of the other ethnic groups¿presumably because the substance lingers in their system longer.

The research could have implications for smokers looking to kick the habit. "Our findings suggest that Chinese-Americans and Chinese who are trying to stop smoking may need a different dose of nicotine medication than do Caucasians," team member Neal Benowitz asserts. The investigators further note that their study results underscore the importance of recognizing ethnic differences in drug metabolism when developing other kinds of drugs as well.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe