New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Study Finds No Link Between Drinking Soda and Cavities in Teens

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Sodas may be largely devoid of protein, vitamins and other nutritious ingredients, but you can't blame them for dental cavities in teens and young adults, a new study says. Rich Forshee and Maureen Storey, research faculty at the Center for Food and Nutrition Policy at the Virginia Institute of Technology, announced the finding Monday at the annual meeting of the American College of Nutrition. After reviewing data collected during the federal National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III, the Virginia Tech team found no association between soft drink consumption and cavities among adolescents, young adults or older adults. Instead, they found a link between sodas and cavities in adults between 25 and 40 years old.

The researchers uncovered several other age-related trends: within the 17-to-40 age group, cavities were slightly more prevalent among those survey respondents with less education and lower income levels than the rest. Among those over 40, Caucasians had more cavities than African Americans, Mexican Americans and other races. Mexican Americans also had fewer cavities than Caucasians in the 25-to-40 age group. And in general, women had four to five more cavities than men. "Our study shows that age is related to dental cavities," Forshee says. "The older we get, the more problems we are likely to encounter."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe