Study Finds Placebo Effect Is Fake

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The placebo effect may have no scientific basis, according to a study published in this week's New England Journal of Medicine. Doctors have long known that about 35 percent of all patients given a placebo will get better, and they had assumed it was because the patients believed the dummy medication would help them. Many people have taken the idea a step further, believing that we can "think ourselves well" to some extent.

To find out, researchers from the University of Copenhagen and the Nordic Cochrane Center, Rigshopitalet, in Denmark looked at the statistical results of 727 trials, focusing on 114 that tested pharmacological, physical and psychological placebos involving 7,500 patients. They reviewed a broad range of different studies, excluding any that had not tested the effectiveness of both a placebo and no treatment at all. Then they examined how test subjects receiving placebos fared in comparison to groups that had received no treatment.

It turned out that the results were similar. "We found little evidence in general that placebos had powerful clinical effects," the authors write, suggesting that "outside the setting of clinical trials, there is no justification for the use of placebos." They also found, however, that placebos had possible small benefits for studies with subjective outcomes and the treatment of pain.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe