New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Study in Worms Shows How Proteins Work to Dispatch Nerve Signals

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Researchers at the University of Utah have unraveled how two proteins¿UNC-13 and syntaxin¿work together to enable nerve cells to communicate. In general, neurons relay messages using chemicals called neurotransmitters. Now Janet Richmond, Robby Weimer and Erik Jorgensen have discovered that UNC-13 primes syntaxin¿much like a crank opening a catapult¿to fire neurotransmitters into the gaps, or synapses, between nerve cells. The finding appears in today's Nature.

The researchers knew that syntaxin comes in two forms. When the protein is unfolded, tiny bubbles filled with neurotransmitters can stick to it, fuse to the inside wall of a nerve cell and then break free into a synapse. When syntaxin is folded, though, the bubbles can't stick to it and the nerve cell can't pass on its signal. Richmond's team suspected that UNC-13 opened syntaxin, thus allowing signals to flow.

To test this theory, they modified the gene encoding syntaxin in a strain of the nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans so that the protein would remain unfolded. As it turned out, neurotransmitters continued to flow, even when the researchers also knocked out the gene for UNC-13 in these worms. When the scientists eliminated UNC-13 in worms that produced normal syntaxin, however, the flow of neurotransmitters stopped, paralyzing the animals.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The team concluded that UNC-13 does indeed unfold syntaxin and is therefore vital to the dispatch of nerve signals and memory. "It [UNC-13] grabs syntaxin and opens it up like a catapult," Jorgensen says. "The connection between nerve cells stores information and transmits it. What this study has shown is what molecules control the strength of those connections and thus how information is stored and transmitted."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe