New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Study Links Dental X-Rays during Pregnancy to Smaller Babies

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Pregnant women are advised to avoid having medical x-rays taken to avoid harming the developing fetus. Now a study published by the Journal of the American Medical Association links dental x-rays administered during pregnancy to low birthweight babies.

Philippe P. Hujoel of the University of Washington and his colleagues studied the records of thousands of women who received dental treatments between 1993 and 2000 in Washington State. The team compared the list to birth certificate records and found that 1,117 of the patients for whom they were able to obtain dental records had delivered low birthweight infants. According to the report, expectant mothers who underwent dental radiography were three times more likely to have a full-term baby weighing in at under five pounds, eight ounces than were women who had not had dental x-rays. "We were surprised by the finding, but it does bear out previous studies that found that other types of diagnostic radiation, such as diagnostic radiation for spine problems, also were associated with low birthweight," Hujoel says.

For now, it remains unclear what causes the association. "We don¿t know whether radiation affects neurohormonal mechanisms in the head and neck region, such as thyroid function, or whether factors unrelated to the x-rays are to blame," Hujoel remarks. In addition, he cautions that the results do not warrant avoiding treatment for serious dental problems, although elective dental x-rays for mom should probably be postponed until after the baby arrives.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe