Study Narrows List of Suspects in Mass Extinction Mystery

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Mass extinctions are, by definition, dramatic events. But the one that punctuated the Permian Period some 250 million years ago was especially spectacular, extinguishing nearly 70 percent of all terrestrial species and 95 percent of marine-dwelling forms. Despite the magnitude of the die-off, it's a whodunit that has long vexed geologists. Numerous culprits have been proposed--from climate change to large-scale volcanism to an asteroid impact--but exactly how these hypotheses stack up against one another has been unclear. To that end, a new analysis of current models may prove insightful. A report detailing the findings appears in the current issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

To evaluate the various theories, Robert Berner of Yale University focused on a certain geochemical signature associated with the extinction event--namely, a sharp drop in the carbon-13 isotope level relative to that of isotopically light carbon. He then assessed the predictions these hypotheses make concerning the global carbon cycle. Neither the release of toxic amounts of carbon dioxide from the ocean nor volcanic degassing could alone account for the observed carbon-13 drop, he found. But another suspect in the die-off--a massive release of methane from methane hydrates stored in sediments--did exactly that.

Berner notes, however, that although the methane scenario best explains the carbon-13 measurements, it cannot explain the higher levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide present at that time. Thus although methane may well have had a hand in the killing, it does not appear to have acted alone. In conclusion, Berner proposes that the extinction may have resulted from a combination of an asteroid impact, methane release and volcanic CO2 release.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe