Study of Cellular Protein Disposal Garners Chemistry Nobel

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Proteins are the building blocks of living things, and much scientific research has been dedicated to figuring out how cells produce their myriad proteins. Fewer researchers were interested in studying the opposite problem: how cells identify and break down unwanted proteins. Now a trio of scientists who did just that has been rewarded with the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for their seminal work in solving this mystery.

Aaron Ciechanover (center) and Avram Hershko (left) of the Israel Institute of Technology, together with Irwin Rose of the University of California at Irvine (right), received the honor ¿for the discovery of ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation,¿ according to the selection committee. Ubiquitin, itself a polypeptide protein, identifies protein molecules that are ready to be destroyed. Once singled out and tagged by ubiquitin, the labeled proteins are sent to the cell's proteasome, which chops them into small pieces. ¿The collaborative work of this international group of researchers has given us an important close-up view of the regulatory processes taking place inside human cells and what happens when these processes don't work properly,¿ notes Charles P. Casey of the University of Wisconsin-Madison and current president of the American Chemical Society,

Protein degradation guided by ubiquitin, which derives its name from the Latin word meaning everywhere, occurs throughout the body. The Nobel committee noted that the laureates' work in the 1980s paved the way to understanding other cell processes such as DNA repair and gene transcription. In addition, some diseases, including cystic fibrosis and cervical cancer, involve improper protein breakdown, so a better understanding of how the process should work could shed light on new treatment options.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe