Study of Lunar Soil Sheds Light on the Sun's Violent Atmosphere

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The violence of the sun's atmosphere makes it both a difficult subject for study and a compelling one. The strength and energy of solar flares and the winds that flow from them periodically make themselves known on Earth as radio interference and spectacular polar auroras, despite our protective atmosphere and magnetic field. In a study published in Friday's Science, two California researchers shed light on the surface of the sun by examining a body without any protection from solar wind whatsoever, the surface of the moon.

The scientists analyzed samples of lunar soil obtained by Apollo 17 astronauts nearly 30 years ago for the presence and distribution of beryllium-10, an unstable isotope produced in the solar atmosphere and carried by solar wind. The sun produces beryllium-10 by the same mechanism that gives us polar auroras: subatomic particles are trapped in a closed magnetic loop and accelerated to extraordinary velocities. When protons caught this way in the sun's atmosphere collide with the nuclei of carbon, nitrogen and oxygen, they can form a nucleus with four protons and six neutrons¿one neutron more than the stable form of beryllium¿for a total of 10 nuclear particles, giving beryllium-10 its name.

The researchers wanted to know what happens to beryllium-10 produced this way and, by extension, what happens to the outer layers of the solar atmosphere in which it is formed. Two models of the solar surface contend. One posits deep atmospheric mixing, and the other envisions steady outward motion with only shallow mixing. By analyzing the concentration of beryllium-10 on the lunar surface, the team was able to estimate the proportion of the sun's total beryllium-10 production (a known quantity) that is ejected without delay. The isotope under study decomposes rapidly, with a half-life of 1.6 million years. Thus a study of its concentration would not include any deposits dating from the formation of the moon or from a time when beryllium-10 was produced more widely and frequently.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Still, the scientists had to control for other sources of beryllium-10 in their lunar sample. "The moon has no atmosphere and no magnetic field, so the solar wind is not kept in any way, shape or form from hitting the surface of the moon," study co-author Marc Cafee of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory reports. This circumstance allows cosmic rays to bombard the moon as well, producing some beryllium-10 locally. The researchers used acids to leach the isotope from soil samples taken from the lunar surface and from about 20 centimeters below it. Using the deeper sample as a baseline, they were able to quantify the amount of beryllium-10 that is deposited on the surface of the moon by the wind.

Even though it travels at between 300 and 800 kilometers per second, solar wind cannot drive the isotope any deeper than one nanometer into the surface of a soil grain. Thus the first mild rinse of acid released 14 to 16 percent more beryllium-10 than the average yield of the entire surface sample. The lunar concentration of beryllium-10 of a conclusively solar origin is consistent with a deposition rate of 2.9 (+/-1.2) x 10-6 atoms per square centimeter per year. This rate could only be sustained by constant and direct ejection of the upper atmosphere of sun in the solar wind. If the solar atmosphere were deeply mixed the researchers expect beryllium-10 would be four or five orders of magnitude scarcer.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe