New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Study Shines Light on Key Language Step

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Some perplexed monkeys are helping scientists better understand why humans became the only animals to evolve language. A report published today in the journal Science indicates that although monkeys can grasp basic grammar rules, they are unable to understand the more complex rules that are central to human language.

Previous research with tamarin monkeys (see image) suggested that the creatures seem to comprehend simple rules analogous to those that determine what types of word pairs belong together. In the new work, W. Tecumseh Fitch of the University of St. Andrews in Scotland and Marc D. Hauser of Harvard University designed a study to test whether the animals could follow more complicated sentence structures, in which words that depend on one another are separated. A classic example of this so-called phrase structure grammar is the "if¿then¿" sentence construction. Tecumseh and Hauser played recordings of human speech that mirrored the two sentence types and found that the monkeys reacted when the voices broke the simple grammar rules but could not discern when the more complicated rules were broken.

College students tested with the same grammar examples correctly identified all of the mistakes, even if they couldn¿t articulate the exact rules that were broken. As a result, the scientists suggest that acquiring the ability to process hierarchical word patterns ¿may have represented a critical juncture in the evolution of the human language faculty.¿

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe