Study Shows African Americans Receive Less Asthma Care

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


African Americans get less quality asthma care than their white counterparts, according to a new study conducted by researchers at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. "The discrepancy in care is striking because it cannot easily be explained by socioeconomic factors or access to care," Jerry Krishnan, lead author of the study, says.

The team surveyed 5,062 managed care patients, 14 percent of them African American and 72 percent women. They adjusted their findings for age, education, employment and the severity of the patients' asthma. The difference between men and women was minor: women used their daily asthma medication slightly less often than men (50 versus 58 percent) and did not visit a specialist as frequently (38 vs.43 percent). But the differences between black and white were significant. The scientists found that only 35 percent of the African Americans, compared to 54 percents of whites, inhaled corticosteroids daily to treat their asthma. So too, only 28 percent of African Americans visited asthma specialists, whereas 41 percent of whites did. Fifty-four percent of whites said they received adequate information about how to manage their asthma during an attack and about how to avoid asthma triggers. Roughly 40 percent of African Americans said the same.

According to the researchers, these findings, published in the July 9th issue of Archives of Internal Medicine, may explain to some extent why African Americans are statistically more likely to develop severe asthma symptoms than whites. But for Krishnan, finding these statistical discrepancies is only the beginning: "We need to further investigate whether these differences in asthma care were due to doctor, patient or health care system-related barriers."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe