Study Shows Drug Resistance Varies by Race

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers have discovered that a genetic mutation known to affect resistance to chemotherapy occurs more frequently in some ethnic groups than in others. According to study results presented on Sunday in New Orleans at the annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research, African and African-American populations contain a higher number of individuals carrying the drug-resistant gene than do Caucasian and Asian populations. The findings could help explain why some patients of African descent respond poorly to anti-cancer drugs.

Although the mutations we hear about are usually associated with hazardous results, some can confer benefits. Howard L. McLeod of Washington University and his colleagues studied a genetic mutation that, in effect, allows chemotherapeutic drugs to do their job¿that is, enter tumor cells and kill them. In its normal state, the gene produces a protein known as PGP that rids cells of drugs. Analyses of DNA test results from 1,280 participants from 10 ethnic populations revealed that Ghanaian, Kenyan, Sudanese and African-American populations have a lower incidence of the helpful mutation.

The study could point the way to more individualized therapy for people who overexpress the PGP protein, perhaps incorporating an existing medication that inhibits it. "While I believe that the biggest reason some African-American cancer patients do not do as well as Caucasian patients is because of their access to care, this finding suggests that there is a little bit more to it," McLeod notes. "Knowing this, we should be able to help decrease the variability in the way people are treated."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe