Study Shows the Queen of Beasts Breeds Democratically

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Among animal societies in which group members cooperate, certain individuals get a better deal, especially when it comes to reproduction. Social insects such as bees, for example, have a single breeding queen. And other cooperative creatures, including numerous birds and carnivore species, exhibit that same pattern of reproductive dominance by one or a few females. New research has revealed a striking exception to this rule, however. According to a report published today in the journal Science, female African lions have an egalitarian breeding system¿setting them apart from not only other social carnivores but even males of their own species.

Previous observations had suggested that lionesses employ a democratic approach to breeding; pridemates hunted and reared their cubs together, and none seemed to be reproducing more than her fair share. But to determine whether subtle reproductive hierarchies might in fact exist, as in the case of female chimpanzees, veteran lion researchers Craig Packer and Anne Pusey of the University of Minnesota decided to take a closer look. They compared lifetime reproductive variation in females from 31 Tanzanian lion prides to the variation in simulated prides, in which reproductive rate and demography were the same as in the real prides but births were randomly allocated. In all of the real prides, some females had more offspring than others. But the same pattern held true for the simulated prides. The team thus failed to find any evidence of true reproductive despotism among female lions.

To explain the unusual system, the authors point out that unlike females of other cooperative species, these cats can't control one another's reproduction. Lionesses go into hiding to give birth, returning to the pride only after the cubs are several weeks old and less vulnerable to attack. This fact, in combination with the mother's formidable teeth and claws, makes it hard for one lioness to kill a pridemate's newborn. Beyond that, females participate in the communal cub-rearing only if they themselves have cubs. Thus, if one lioness were to eliminate another's cub, she would lose that female's contribution to the rearing of her own offspring. "Lion society provides a distinct alternative to the dog/bird model of cooperative breeding," the authors write, "and reveals the female lion to be one of nature's true democrats."

The article "Divided We Fall: Cooperation among Lions," by Craig Packer and Anne E. Pusey (Scientific American May 1997) is available for purchase at the Scientific American Archive.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe