Study Suggests Heart Muscle Cells Regenerate After Heart Attack

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Contrary to conventional wisdom, heart muscle cells do regenerate after heart attacks, researchers have found. In recent years, hints that heart cells can perform this healing feat have trickled in. Now the new findings, described today in the New England Journal of Medicine, provide the most compelling indication yet of heart cell regeneration.

Researchers at New York Medical College examined heart muscle cells, or myocytes, taken from patients four to 12 days after they had suffered a heart attack, sampling both the zone near the site of the heart attack and parts farther away from the damaged muscle tissue. To determine whether the heart was healing or not, the team looked for a protein known as Ki67, which is expressed in the nuclei of myocytes during division. Myocytes from the heart attack border zone, they found, multiplied 70 times faster than those in a normal heart; the cells farther away from the diseased zone multiplied 24 times faster than normal.

Future efforts, team leader Piero Anversa suggests, should investigate the source of the dividing myocytes. To that end, preliminary results hint that they might originate from stem cells in the heart, he reports. If so, this could lead to future treatment options. "If we can prove the existence of cardiac stem cells and make these cells migrate to the region of tissue damage," Anversa muses, "we could conceivably improve the repair of damaged heart muscle and reduce heart failure."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American