New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Study Suggests Language Shapes Thoughts

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Shakespeare once wrote ¿that which we call a rose, by any other name would smell as sweet.¿ But does the fact that it's called a rose actually affect how people perceive the flower? That's a question that has been puzzling scientists since the 1930s, when Benjamin Lee Whorf proposed his linguistic theory that language can influence the nature and content of thought. Findings published online today by the journal Science support the Whorfian hypothesis and indicate that the language of numbers shapes how members of a small South American tribe count.

Peter Gordon of Columbia University spent years studying an isolated Amazon tribe called the Pirahã that has fewer than 200 members. Pirahã people use a counting system in which quantities beyond two are not differentiated but are instead referred to simply as ¿many.¿ In addition, the word for ¿one¿ can actually mean ¿approximately one.¿ To test whether this systems limits how the Pirahã perceive larger amounts, Gordon gave tribe members numerical tasks in which they were asked to match small groups of items based on how many objects were present. Although the adults performed well when there were one, two or three items, their accuracy declined when there were eight to 10 things. With larger groups, they always answered incorrectly.

The results indicate that language can define cognition, at least when it comes to numbers. ¿Whether one language chooses to distinguish one thing versus another affects how an individual perceives reality,¿ Gordon says. But he cautions that the situation may be unique, and that the linguistic determinism theory may not hold for all types of thought.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe