Study Suggests Limit to New Neuron Growth in Adults

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The finding a few years ago that adult primates, including humans, could produce new neurons garnered much excitement. Ever since, scientists have been searching for further evidence, in various parts of the brain, that this is indeed the case. According to a study published in the current issue of the journal Science though, adults primates can't create new neurons in the most sophisticated part of the brain, the neocortex.

David Kornack of the University of Rochester and Pasko Rakic of Yale University studied the brains of adult macaque monkeys injected with two types of markers: radioactive material that tags new cell growth and molecules that mark neurons. The scientists then examined more than a thousand cells from the neocortex that contained both types of markers, suggesting that these cells were new neurons. They found that many seemingly new neurons were instead two separate cells such as an old neuron and a newly generated glial cell. "The present findings," the authors write, "lead to the conclusion that neocortical neurons are not normally renewed during the life-span of macaque monkeys¿similar limits may exist in the human forebrain."

The scientists did discover new neurons in two other parts of the brain, the hippocampus and the olfactory bulb. According to Kornack, "if we can find out what allows stem cells in those few restricted brain regions to continue producing neurons into adulthood, perhaps we can mimic that magic in other areas of the brain¿such as the neocortex¿that can suffer neuronal loss but don't normally make neurons."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe