Study Suggests Smallpox Vaccine Offers Long-Term Protection

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The results of a new study suggest that the standard smallpox vaccine confers surprisingly long-lasting immunity. Vaccinations are generally thought to last seven to 10 years, but researchers writing today in the New England Journal of Medicine report that people vaccinated decades ago can still have a strong immune response to the smallpox virus's close cousin, vaccinia.

"It's a question that's been largely unexamined," says study co-author Jeffrey A. Frelinger of the University of North Carolina. To address the question, he and Lawal Garba, also at UNC, tested blood samples from 13 laboratory workers who had received the vaccine because they work with vaccinia virus. Four of the subjects had been vaccinated less than five years ago. The others had been vaccinated between five and 35 years ago or more than 35 years ago. Exposing the samples to vaccinia virus, the researchers tallied the number of so-called CD8 T cells that exhibited the proper immune response--namely, making the protective molecule interferon-gamma.

They found that even the cells of those participants who had received the vaccination more than 35 years ago still produced interferon gamma, albeit it at a slightly lower level. Specifically, whereas 6.5 percent of CD8 cells produced interferon gamma in recently vaccinated individuals, 4.8 percent did so in people who had received their shots more than three decades ago.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"Resistance to vaccinia is waning but not rapidly. It is still substantial," Frelinger observes. "We would think that people even 35 years later would still have substantial resistance to smallpox infection." He adds that this could have important implications for developing a smallpox vaccination strategy. "If you had a limited supply of vaccine," he remarks, "I think you'd want to target predominantly previously unvaccinated individuals."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe