Study Suggests Supernova Snuffed out Marine Life Two Million Years Ago

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: NASA/CHANDRA X-RAY OBSERVATORY

The phrase mass extinction often calls to mind such potential culprits as asteroid impacts and volcanism. But new research suggests that in the case of a die-off of marine creatures that occurred two million years ago, at the interface of the Pleistocene and Pliocene epochs, a different phenomenon was to blame. According to a report appearing in the February 25 issue of the journal Physical Review Letters, cosmic rays from the explosion of a nearby supernova may have done these animals in.

Conventional explanations for the extinction, which claimed the lives of numerous molluscs, look to the emergence of the Panama isthmus or climate cooling from Northern Hemisphere glaciations. But analysis of a cluster of stars in our galactic neighborhood known as the Scorpius-Centaurus association led Narciso Ben¿tez of Johns Hopkins University and colleagues to conclude otherwise. They determined that Scorpius-Centaurus has produced 20 supernovae explosions¿the swan songs of dying stars¿during the last 11 million years. One of these outbursts, the team proposes, occurred around two million years ago, and took place close enough to Earth for its cosmic rays to catalyze large-scale destruction of the ozone layer. The resulting increase in harmful ultraviolet rays from the sun reaching Earth, they say, could have killed the marine plankton that molluscs depend on for food.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The supernova explosion hypothesis for mass extinctions has floated around in academic circles for more than four decades, but the new study may make the strongest case yet. The next step, Ben¿tez and his co-authors note, will be to determine more precisely the time and distance at which each supernova explosion took place. "A coincidence in time between the [supernova] expected to have the strongest effects on the biosphere and the Pleistocene-Pliocene extinction," they write, "would strongly support the existence of a link between both events."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe