Study Suggests Vitamin C Is a Double-Edged Sword

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


When it comes to preventing cancer, vitamin C may do as much harm as good, researchers now say. According to the results of a study described today in the journal Science, the well-known antioxidant can also produce DNA-damaging compounds. And mutations caused by such agents are known from tumors. Though the findings do not indicate that vitamin C causes cancer or that people should eliminate it from their diets, they may help explain why supplements of the vitamin have proved ineffective at combating cancer.

Scientists have known for some time that vitamin C acts to render free radicals harmless. But some have wondered whether it might also prompt compounds known as lipid hydroperoxides to degrade into DNA-damaging genotoxins in the same way that certain metal ions do. To assess vitamin C's effects, Ian A. Blair of the University of Pennsylvania and his colleagues added it to test tubes containing lipid hydroperoxides. The vitamin, they found, induced genotoxin formation more than twice as effectively as the metal ions did. Taking that into consideration, "it's possible that vitamin C isn't working in cancer prevention studies because it's causing as much damage as it's preventing," Blair remarks.

Looking forward, the researchers plan to investigate whether vitamin C spurs genotoxin production in intact cells. In the meantime, however, the argument that it can stave off cancer is unsupported. The logic some researchers have followed in recommending vitamin C supplements to cancer patients "is that fruits, vegetables, et cetera, contain vitamin C; these foods prevent cancer; thus vitamin C prevents cancer," Blair notes. "But our message is that it's the total diet that's important, not just one antioxidant."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe