New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Study Supports Impact Explanation for Permian Mass Extinction

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Around 250 million years ago, at the end of the Permian period, life on the earth almost disappeared completely in the most devastating mass extinction of all time. Yet despite the magnitude of the event (nearly 70 percent of terrestrial species and 95 percent of marine species vanished), its cause has proved difficult to identify. Unlike the extinction that claimed the dinosaurs some 65 million years ago, the biological and environmental changes that characterize the Permian crisis seem to have unfolded gradually. Most earth scientists thus favored scenarios involving climate and sea-level fluctuations, a dwindling supply of oxygen in the oceans and severe volcanism.

More recently, however, indications that the Permian extinction proceeded far more swiftly than previously thought have surfaced. And earlier this year, researchers reported detecting in Permian rocks signatures of extraterrestrial molecules that most likely arrived on an asteroid or comet. Now findings reported in the September issue of the journal Geology are lending additional weight to the argument that, like the dinosaur-squelching extinction after it, the Permian catastrophe resulted from an extraterrestrial impact.

Geochemical and paleontological analyses of late Permian sediments from southern China, Kunio Kaiho of Tohoku University and his colleagues report, suggest that an asteroid or comet hit the ocean at the end of the Permian. This collision, they argue, prompted a massive release of sulfur from the earth's mantle to the ocean-atmosphere system, which in turn led to oxygen consumption and strong acid rain.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"Understanding the cause of this event is important because it represents the largest mass extinction and it led to the subsequent origination of recent [life] on Earth," Kaiho remarks. "We would like to clarify the paleoenvironmental changes and causes of the end Permian mass extinction in different places and of the other mass extinctions that occurred during the past 500 million years."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and was formerly senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe