New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Sugar Treatment Prolongs Platelet Shelf Life

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A spoonful of sugar may hold the key to preserving blood platelets used for life-saving transfusions, researchers report. Currently, samples of blood-clotting platelets awaiting a recipient are stored at room temperature and only last about five days. Refrigeration extends the potential storage time, but once infused into a patient these platelets are attacked and removed from the blood stream, rendering them useless. The new findings, published today in the journal Science, indicate that adding a simple sugar to chilled platelets solves this problem in mice. If the same holds true for humans, the platelets could be safely preserved for more than twice as long as is presently possible.

Previous research by Thomas P. Stossel of Harvard Medical School and his colleagues indicated that chilling platelets caused some of the protein receptors on their surfaces to cluster together. When infused into a patient, immune cells known as macrophages detect these clusters and ingest the platelets. In the new work, the scientists hypothesized that if the clusters could be disguised from macrophages, chilled platelets could continue functioning as well as non-refrigerated platelets do. To do this, the scientists added a sugar to the platelet solution. Known as UDP galactose, it conceals the clusters on the chilled platelets that elicit an immune response. In test-tube experiments, platelets treated with the sugar avoided detection by macrophages even after having been stored for 12 days. In fact, sugar-treated refrigerated platelets injected into mice were still detectable after 24 hours, whereas levels of untreated chilled platelets diminished rapidly after the transfusion.

Because UDP galactose is already present in human cells and body fluids, the researchers are optimistic that this technique would not pose additional health hazards to patients receiving platelet donations. If judged to be safe and effective in humans, sugar-coating the platelets should help ease shortages. "As the population gets older, we need more and more donations, and the number of younger donors is shrinking," notes study co-author Karin Hoffmeister of Brigham and Women's Hospital. "The blood banking industry loses a significant amount of money by throwing these bags of platelets away."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe