Suggestions for the Workshop- October 7, 1911

Ingenious Expedients of Resourceful Mechanics

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Handy Mans Medicine Chest To the Editor of the Workshop Department: In looking over Handy Mans Medicine Chest, in the issue of September 9th, I notice that the collodion dressing with aristol or iodoform added calls for 50 grams to the ounce. I intended this to re ad GO grains. This amount would do more harm, but .as there are only 31.1 grammes to the ounce, by using 50 grammes of aristol you have. more aristol than collodion, which I fear would be an almost useless mixture. The mistake of reading grams for grains is often made by druggists, and for this reason I believe that when grammes is intended, it should be written out in full (grammes). William R. Inghram, M.D. Dangers of Gasoline Vapor Cleaning To the Editor of the Workshop Department: The. description of an automobile cleaning device published among the Suggestions for the Workshop on page 276 of September 23d issue, is of considerable interest from an insurance point of view, from the fact that the vapor from one pint of gasoline will make 200 cubic feet of air explosive. The device seems to be an excellent gas generator; a flame some distance away will ignite the vapor, and the operator of the cleaner will never know what hit him. Would it not be well to caution your readers against the use of such a dangerous machine? P. D. C. Steward.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 105 Issue 15This article was published with the title “Suggestions for the Workshop” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 105 No. 15 (), p. 317
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican10071911-317

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe