New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Sulphur Water

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


MESSRS. EDITORS:—In perusing your valuable jour-nal, I find on page 178, Vol. III., that a correspondent at Sparta, Ga., asks the question whether sulphur water could have been the cause of his flue boiler exploding. Sulphur water, as it is commonly called, we are very familiar with ; and its effects are very destructive iri anthracite coal regionsor, at least, in this and our adjoining counties. The water running out of old mines may be as clear as crystal, and yet, by evaporating it in boilers, it will turn red and rusty in a short time. It is only used when no other can be obtained ; for it is so destructive as to render boilers useless in a short time. Our boilers are generally constructed in a cylindrical form, about 31 inches in diameter, of one-faurth inch iron for colleries, and in many instances, where the water is used direct from the mines, they are repaired about every month; and frequently in ton or twelve months rendered entirely useless. Couhl some of your intelligent writers give us a remedy for this great evil? D. ZUERN. Shamokin, Pa., Dec. 5, I860. THE world receives now, in a single year, nearly one-tenth as much gold as was obtained in the whole period from the discovery of America down to the year 1848.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 3 Issue 25newThis article was published with the title “Sulphur Water” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 3 No. 25new (), p. 386
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican12151860-386b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe