Sulphur Water

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


MESSRS. EDITORS:—In perusing your valuable jour-nal, I find on page 178, Vol. III., that a correspondent at Sparta, Ga., asks the question whether sulphur water could have been the cause of his flue boiler exploding. Sulphur water, as it is commonly called, we are very familiar with ; and its effects are very destructive iri anthracite coal regionsor, at least, in this and our adjoining counties. The water running out of old mines may be as clear as crystal, and yet, by evaporating it in boilers, it will turn red and rusty in a short time. It is only used when no other can be obtained ; for it is so destructive as to render boilers useless in a short time. Our boilers are generally constructed in a cylindrical form, about 31 inches in diameter, of one-faurth inch iron for colleries, and in many instances, where the water is used direct from the mines, they are repaired about every month; and frequently in ton or twelve months rendered entirely useless. Couhl some of your intelligent writers give us a remedy for this great evil? D. ZUERN. Shamokin, Pa., Dec. 5, I860. THE world receives now, in a single year, nearly one-tenth as much gold as was obtained in the whole period from the discovery of America down to the year 1848.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 3 Issue 25newThis article was published with the title “Sulphur Water” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 3 No. 25new (), p. 386
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican12151860-386b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe