Superbug Gained Resistance from Neighboring Bacteria

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The bacterium Staphylococcus is known for its ability to develop resistance to most classes of antibiotics soon after they enter widespread clinical use. Vancomycin--a so-called last-ditch drug--can stop many of these multidrug-resistant strains. But some bacteria that are closely related to S. aureus--which often causes life-threatening infections in hospital settings--can fend off vancomycin, prompting concerns that soon S. aureus will, too. Scientists describe one instance of a vancomycin-resistant strain of the ubiquitous bug in the current issue of the journal Science and show that the gene responsible for its invulnerability jumped from another bacteria.

In June 2002, the vancomycin-resistant staph was cultured from foot ulcers on a patient in a Michigan hospital; fortunately, it did not spread throughout the clinic. Linda M. Weigel of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and her colleagues analyzed the microbe to determine the source of its resistance. They found that the responsible gene, Tn1546 (vanA), had come from another species of bug present in the patient's sore. According to the report, a circular, double-stranded unit of DNA known as a plasmid jumped from Enterococcus faecalis to the S. aureus strain, thereby conferring the ability to fight vancomycin.

The researchers tested whether this staph strain could in turn pass on its resistance to other types of Staphylococcus and found that the trait was indeed transferable. The authors note that their findings reinforce "concerns of potential widespread resistance to one of the few classes of agents still active against multidrug-resistant S. aureus.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe