New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Supercomputer Simulates How Materials Fracture

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientists have completed one of the most detailed simulations to date of how materials break, according to two new studies. The findings, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, should give researchers insight into why substances fail under certain conditions and could aid in the design of new materials with customized properties.

The researchers utilized the power of the year-old ASCI White supercomputer, which can complete more than 1013 computations a second, to model the behavior of up to one billion atoms. "The sudden unexpected fracture of a material can have devastating consequences, such as during an earthquake or the failure of an airplane structure," notes Farid F. Abraham of IBM's Almaden Research Center. To better understand the processes at work, he and his colleagues simulated cubes of various materials and tracked the responses of individual atoms during two types of failure. In the first, brittle fracture, bonds between neighboring atoms are ruptured, which happens when glass breaks. In the second, so-called work hardening, a material initially becomes flexible in response to applied pressure but breaks after repeated stress. A bent paper clip often succumbs to this phenomenon.

Each simulation required up to 10 days of computations, during which the supercomputer calculated the forces between each of the atoms and its neighbors. In the first experiment, which modeled a two-layer solid that experienced brittle fracture, the scientists found that a crack could travel through the material at speeds greater than the speed of sound. Although such supersonic crack speeds were previously thought to be impossible, they have been observed or suspected both in laboratory experiments and in recent earthquakes in Turkey. The new results lend further theoretical support to such observations.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In the second experiment, the supercomputer modeled atomic interactions as the edges of a simulated cube made of a ductile substance were pulled apart. The atoms in such a material initially respond to stress by sliding past one another, creating so-called dislocations of misaligned atoms. The computations revealed the formation and interaction of hundreds of atomic ripples. In some materials, dislocations can simply pass through the material, but if the stress continues in stronger substances, dislocations get pinned together, eventually causing the material to turn brittle and break.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe