Supercooled Organ Donations Could Last for Days

Scientists preserve viable rat livers for three days with new method

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

About 6,400 liver transplants took place in 2013 in the U.S., but demand far outpaces supply: more than 15,000 patients are on the current waiting list. Compounding the lack of availability, livers have only a small window of time to reach their destinations. The organs stay fresh for just 12 hours, during which they are kept on ice with a cold preservation solution. That is because freezing them is not an option—the process creates ice crystals that slice through the cells on thawing.

At Harvard Medical School, researchers are ditching the conventional storage technique in favor of a method that could extend the shelf life of livers and other organs. In results published in July in Nature Medicine, they report preserving viable rat livers for three whole days.

To preserve the organs for that long, the team used a specialized machine to erect a chemical buffer zone around the organ's cells. That buffer protected the cells' membranes against the threat of ice. The team then slowly cooled the livers to −6 degrees Celsius without actually freezing them—“supercooling” them.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In the experiment, six rats received livers supercooled for three days, and each one survived for three months (at which point the experiment ended, and they were euthanized). As expected, rats that received three-day-old livers preserved on ice all died. The supercooling method, however, cannot work indefinitely: only about 60 percent of rats receiving livers stored for four days managed to survive for the study's duration. Next, the team plans on testing the method with pigs and humans.

The success with this approach, the authors say, could extend the reach of organ transplants and so provide greater access to patients. In the U.S., the national map for liver distribution is currently far from equal. For instance, patients living near trouble spots, such as big highways prone to traffic accidents, have a higher chance of receiving a viable liver.

In the future, supercooling may also support research with organs on a chip, according to Korkut Uygun, who was part of the liver experiment and is an assistant professor of surgery at Harvard Medical School. Organs on a chip are collections of laboratory-grown human cells designed to mimic the organs in the body. They are a highly anticipated way to study how our organs work and how they respond to various drugs. Supercooling would make shipping them from manufacturing labs to researchers more practical. For now the promise of getting transplant organs to patients remains the primary focus. The waiting list for all organs has climbed above 122,000.

Dina Fine Maron, formerly an associate editor at Scientific American, is now a wildlife trade investigative reporter at National Geographic.

More by Dina Fine Maron
Scientific American Magazine Vol 311 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Longer-Lasting Organs” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 311 No. 3 (), p. 24
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0914-24

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe