Supernovae Spawned Universe's First Solid Particles

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Astronomers have detected a cosmic dust storm surrounding the remains of a supernova, according to new research. The findings, published today in the journal Nature, suggest that these exploded stars could be a major source of the first solid particles in our universe.

Previous observations had indicated that winds emanating from red giant stars near the end of their lives create cosmic dust, tiny solid particles mainly made up of carbon and silicates. But because it takes about nine billion years for stars such as our sun to reach this stage, it remained unclear what supplied cosmic dust in the first billion years of the universe. Although scientists had found traces of ancient particles around supernovae, they needed more evidence to establish the link. "The origin of cosmic dust is, in fact, the basic question of the origin of our planet and others," lead author Loretta Dunne of Cardiff University says. "Effectively, we live on a very large collection of cosmic dust grains and yet, until now, we have not been sure where cosmic dust is made."

Dunne and her colleagues used SCUBA, a powerful camera attached to the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope in Hawaii, to investigate Cassiopeia A, the remnant of a supernova explosion located 11,000 light-years from Earth. Whereas earlier attempts had only located relatively warm dust particles, SCUBA detected frigid dust particles at temperatures as low as -257 degrees Celsius. In all, the astronomers discovered dust totaling between two and four times the mass of the sun and "over 1,000 times what's been seen before," according to team member Stephen Eales of Cardiff University. "Cassiopeia A must have been extremely efficient at creating dust from the elements available."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe