New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Supernovae Spawned Universe's First Solid Particles

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Astronomers have detected a cosmic dust storm surrounding the remains of a supernova, according to new research. The findings, published today in the journal Nature, suggest that these exploded stars could be a major source of the first solid particles in our universe.

Previous observations had indicated that winds emanating from red giant stars near the end of their lives create cosmic dust, tiny solid particles mainly made up of carbon and silicates. But because it takes about nine billion years for stars such as our sun to reach this stage, it remained unclear what supplied cosmic dust in the first billion years of the universe. Although scientists had found traces of ancient particles around supernovae, they needed more evidence to establish the link. "The origin of cosmic dust is, in fact, the basic question of the origin of our planet and others," lead author Loretta Dunne of Cardiff University says. "Effectively, we live on a very large collection of cosmic dust grains and yet, until now, we have not been sure where cosmic dust is made."

Dunne and her colleagues used SCUBA, a powerful camera attached to the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope in Hawaii, to investigate Cassiopeia A, the remnant of a supernova explosion located 11,000 light-years from Earth. Whereas earlier attempts had only located relatively warm dust particles, SCUBA detected frigid dust particles at temperatures as low as -257 degrees Celsius. In all, the astronomers discovered dust totaling between two and four times the mass of the sun and "over 1,000 times what's been seen before," according to team member Stephen Eales of Cardiff University. "Cassiopeia A must have been extremely efficient at creating dust from the elements available."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe