New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Supervolcanoes Erupt by Their Own Rules

Mega-eruptions and smaller volcanoes are triggered by different mechanisms

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Huge volcanic blasts occur less frequently than scientists would expect, and now volcanologists think they can explain why: super-eruptions and smaller eruptions are triggered by fundamentally different processes.

Small volcanoes, such as Italy’s Stromboli, erupt when molten rock rises from deep within Earth and then stalls in an underground chamber until enough pressure builds to blast it out to the surface. But the magma chambers of giant volcanoes—such as the one that erupted 2 million years ago beneath what is now Yellowstone National Park in the western U.S.—are too large for pressure from magma squirts to cause an eruption.

Instead, the molten rock accumulates until its sheer buoyancy creates a different kind of stress, one that cracks open the top of the chamber and starts an eruption, researchers report.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“Essentially we identify two different trigger mechanisms for eruptions—one for small ones up to about 500 cubic kilometers of magma, and one where we can generate super-eruptions,” says Luca Caricchi, a volcanologist at the University of Geneva in Switzerland.

Caricchi and his colleagues describe the scenario today in Nature Geoscience (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group). Big eruptions are less common in the geological record than scientists would expect if they were to simply extrapolate from the number of small eruptions that go off over time. That difference could be due to a sampling bias or to a fundamental difference between big and small eruptions.

Caricchi and his team used modeling and simulations to study the many factors that go into an eruption, from the heat of rising magma to the forces required to crack the top of a chamber. For small volcanoes, the scientists confirmed that the pressure of magma rising from below was enough to trigger an eruption. “It’s like blowing inside a little balloon—if you blow fast enough you can make it explode,” says Caricchi.

But adding magma to a much larger chamber would be like blowing fruitlessly into a hot-air passenger balloon. Instead, a supervolcano accumulates a huge amount of magma, which is less dense than the surrounding rock and hence more buoyant. At some threshold, Caricchi says, there is enough magma in the chamber for its buoyancy to crack the rock above it and trigger an eruption.

The idea is bolstered by a laboratory study, also published today in Nature Geoscience. A team led by geoscientists Wim Malfait and Carmen Sanchez-Valle, of ETH Zurich in Switzerland, measured the density of molten rock chemically similar to that found at many volcanoes. The scientists used the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility in Grenoble, France, to re-create the high pressures and temperatures found inside Earth.

From the density measurements they could determine the magma's buoyancy. “The bigger a magma chamber gets, the more buoyancy will start to play in,” says Malfait.

Caricchi and his team have also worked out how big a magma chamber could theoretically get. The maximum size for an unerupted chamber of magma depends on a balance between its thickness and its horizontal extent: a chamber that is too thick will erupt, and a chamber that is too wide will start to cool and crystallize at its edges.

The biggest chamber possible would be about 90 kilometers across and contain about 35,000 cubic kilometers of magma, Caricchi says. That’s seven times the amount of magma spewed out during the largest eruption known—from the La Garita caldera 28 million years ago in what is now Colorado.

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on January 5, 2014.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe