Supply Chain Emissions Make for a Bigger Carbon Footprint

The emissions needed to make and deliver consumer goods are a leading culprit of climate change

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A country's energy consumption of gasoline, coal and other fossil fuels is often the attention-grabber in climate discussions. But the energy to make and deliver consumer goods is a more hidden carbon culprit, a recent study says.

Steven Davis, a postdoctoral student in the Department of Global Ecology at the Carnegie Institute of Washington, tracked the supply chain of greenhouse gases from goods traded internationally in 2004. By following carbon emissions in more than 100 countries and 57 industrial sectors -- from the extraction of the fuels to the energy inputs in creating goods and services to delivery to the final consumer -- he and his colleagues uncovered a more complete story of who emits the world's greenhouse gases, and at which point in the supply chain.

"We are exposing this so that it's not as 'under the table,'" Davis said, "to just be clear about the disparate responsibility people need to share along supply chain." The best solution, he concluded, is to price carbon at its source. It would be just as effective as accounting for emissions higher up on the chain, he said.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Davis and his colleagues found that the biggest fuel-burning countries may be the heaviest carbon emitters, but not necessarily have the biggest consumption footprint.

Once the researchers balanced the equation, they found that the world's biggest economies -- the United States, the European Union, the Middle East, Russia, China and Japan -- together account for 59 percent of the total difference between fossil fuel extraction emissions and emissions from the production of goods. When it came to consumption emissions, the margin was slightly higher, 64 percent, indicating that higher rates of consumption are tied to carbon emissions.

There were some exceptions to the rule. While China's consumption of fossil fuel emissions is relatively modest, its global manufacturing contributed 826 million tonnes of CO2 to Europe, the United States and Japan. Oil-rich but poverty-stricken countries also faced an imbalance.

"There's actually quite a gap among countries that are exporters," he said. "Some are petro states, like Nigeria, [that] haven't managed to export that for a robust economy."

Nevertheless, he argued the burden should be passed along the line, a view he hopes will resonate at the U.N. climate negotiations in Durban, South Africa, in December.

"If you look at the goods you're getting, it's a more complex situation," he said.

The findings have been published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC. www.eenews.net, 202-628-6500

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe