Fuggedaboudit, or Remember—It Just Takes Practice

Conscious memory manipulation could aid in designing both clinical treatments and new drug targets for patients suffering from phobias and post-traumatic stress

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A new study, the results of which could significantly improve treatment for everything from anxiety to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), shows that people can suppress emotionally wrenching memories at will with practice. The report, published in this week's issue of Science begins to shed light on the brain activities involved in quashing painful memories.

A research team, led by Brendan Depue, a doctoral candidate in psychology at the University of Colorado at Boulder's Center for Neuroscience, trained 16 subjects—none of whom were previously diagnosed with any psychiatric problems—to recognize 40 pairs of visual stimuli. They were shown cards with pictures of a person's face with a neutral expression along with corresponding cards comprising images designed to evoke strong negative emotions such as those of injured soldiers, and victims of car crashes and violent crimes. These "paired-associate memory" cards were shown repeatedly until all the participants coupled each face with its corresponding disturbing image.

Researchers then scanned the brains of volunteers with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while showing them 32 of the face cards; with half of them, subjects were instructed to consciously think about the associated harrowing counterpart and with the other half, they were instructed to consciously suppress their thoughts about it. Each image was shown 12 times with the same instructions on whether or not to try to conjure the corresponding emotionally charged memory. (The eight faces left out served as a baseline to determine exactly what effect repeatedly conjuring or suppressing memories had on a subjects' ability to recall them.)


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"The brain imaging data show that the areas of the brain that support memory and underlie memory's existence in the brain are down-regulated [meaning their activity is lessened]" Depue says. During memory suppression, he says, activity tapers off in the brain's visual cortex (which regulates visual representation of a memory), hippocampus (responsible for memory formation and retrieval) and amygdala (a region in continuous communication with the hippocampus that formulates emotional responses to memories). At the same time, there's an increase in activity in the prefrontal cortex, the seat of cognitive control and the source of the motivation for taking actions. "What it looks like is that the prefrontal cortex is modulating those other areas and downregulating them," Depue says.

Subjects next were again shown all 40 of the face flash cards and directed to write brief descriptions of the memories evoked by each. The subjects' memories of images they suppressed were almost uniformly below the baseline and the ones they practiced recalling were almost without fail more vivid than those they deliberately tried to forget.

Depue says that if the results can be replicated in psychiatric patients suffering from disorders such as clinical depression and PTSD, they could help scientists "in understanding where a dysfunction lies … and specifically, in developing psychopharmaceutical approaches to better target the suppression of [the] emotional memory mechanism."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe