New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Fuggedaboudit, or Remember—It Just Takes Practice

Conscious memory manipulation could aid in designing both clinical treatments and new drug targets for patients suffering from phobias and post-traumatic stress

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A new study, the results of which could significantly improve treatment for everything from anxiety to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), shows that people can suppress emotionally wrenching memories at will with practice. The report, published in this week's issue of Science begins to shed light on the brain activities involved in quashing painful memories.

A research team, led by Brendan Depue, a doctoral candidate in psychology at the University of Colorado at Boulder's Center for Neuroscience, trained 16 subjects—none of whom were previously diagnosed with any psychiatric problems—to recognize 40 pairs of visual stimuli. They were shown cards with pictures of a person's face with a neutral expression along with corresponding cards comprising images designed to evoke strong negative emotions such as those of injured soldiers, and victims of car crashes and violent crimes. These "paired-associate memory" cards were shown repeatedly until all the participants coupled each face with its corresponding disturbing image.

Researchers then scanned the brains of volunteers with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while showing them 32 of the face cards; with half of them, subjects were instructed to consciously think about the associated harrowing counterpart and with the other half, they were instructed to consciously suppress their thoughts about it. Each image was shown 12 times with the same instructions on whether or not to try to conjure the corresponding emotionally charged memory. (The eight faces left out served as a baseline to determine exactly what effect repeatedly conjuring or suppressing memories had on a subjects' ability to recall them.)


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"The brain imaging data show that the areas of the brain that support memory and underlie memory's existence in the brain are down-regulated [meaning their activity is lessened]" Depue says. During memory suppression, he says, activity tapers off in the brain's visual cortex (which regulates visual representation of a memory), hippocampus (responsible for memory formation and retrieval) and amygdala (a region in continuous communication with the hippocampus that formulates emotional responses to memories). At the same time, there's an increase in activity in the prefrontal cortex, the seat of cognitive control and the source of the motivation for taking actions. "What it looks like is that the prefrontal cortex is modulating those other areas and downregulating them," Depue says.

Subjects next were again shown all 40 of the face flash cards and directed to write brief descriptions of the memories evoked by each. The subjects' memories of images they suppressed were almost uniformly below the baseline and the ones they practiced recalling were almost without fail more vivid than those they deliberately tried to forget.

Depue says that if the results can be replicated in psychiatric patients suffering from disorders such as clinical depression and PTSD, they could help scientists "in understanding where a dysfunction lies … and specifically, in developing psychopharmaceutical approaches to better target the suppression of [the] emotional memory mechanism."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe