Svelte Spiral Sparks Questions about Galaxy Formation

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: Courtesy of OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY

Images from the Gemini North telescope on Mauna Kea in Hawaii show that the nearby spiral galaxy M33 is slimmer than astronomers had suspected. The new findings, presented yesterday at a meeting of the American Astronomical Society in Pasadena, Calif., may force researchers to revise current theories about the formation of such galaxies.

In most spiral galaxies, curved arms of gas, dust and stars radiate out from a spherical nucleus of stars. The galaxy thus resembles a flattened disk with a bulging center. Current models of spiral galaxy formation posit that the galaxies start out as a ball of gas and dust. Later, the edges flatten out and form the spiral arms, but the center retains a bulge, which normally contains the old stars that date back to when the galaxy formed. Previous investigations had purportedly located the bulge in M33, but when Andrew Stephens and Jay Frogel of Ohio State University examined the new images, they found a svelte center. It's as if the outer disk extended to M33's core, Stephens says. Furthermore, the infrared imaging of the galactic center revealed bright red middle-age stars and bright blue young stars (see image), instead of the old stars that usually occupy the bellies of spiral galaxies.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As is often the case, the new results raise more questions than they answer. "If M33 doesn't have a bulge at all, then how exactly did it form," Stephens muses. "If it has young stars in its bulge, what triggered their formation?"

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe