New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Sweaty Mannequin Models Clothes for Extreme Conditions

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Not many people would want Walter's job. As a test subject for new clothing, he is subjected to harsh conditions that simulate extreme environments such as wind blown mountaintops or Arctic tundra. But Walter is no ordinary employee. He is the first mannequin of his kind that is capable of walking, dressing¿and sweating¿like a real person. Described in the July issue of the journal Measurement Science and Technology, Walter should help scientists design apparel better suited to settings in which, as the researchers put it, "thermal comfort may be a matter of life or death."

The U.S. Army started developing mannequins for testing the limitations of their uniforms as early as 1940. Over the years the dummies became more lifelike, but one aspect of human physiology continued to prove elusive: perspiration. Now Jintu Fan and Yisong Chen of the Institute of Textiles and Clothing at Hong Kong Polytechnic University in Kowloon have developed a skin for Walter that simulates sweating. Tiny pores in the fabric covering permit the evaporation of "sweat" by transferring moisture from heated water inside the mannequin. Thanks to a convenient zipper down Walter's back, different versions of the skin can be interchanged to mimic varying rates of perspiration.

Limitations to Walter's lifelike qualities remain, however. For one, he perspires uniformly over the entire surface area of his body, in contrast to the distribution of sweat in a real person. Still, Fan says "The mannequin will also be extremely useful for better understanding the dynamics of heat and moisture transfer from the human body to the environment." Pretty smart for a dummy.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe