Sweaty Mannequin Models Clothes for Extreme Conditions

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Not many people would want Walter's job. As a test subject for new clothing, he is subjected to harsh conditions that simulate extreme environments such as wind blown mountaintops or Arctic tundra. But Walter is no ordinary employee. He is the first mannequin of his kind that is capable of walking, dressing¿and sweating¿like a real person. Described in the July issue of the journal Measurement Science and Technology, Walter should help scientists design apparel better suited to settings in which, as the researchers put it, "thermal comfort may be a matter of life or death."

The U.S. Army started developing mannequins for testing the limitations of their uniforms as early as 1940. Over the years the dummies became more lifelike, but one aspect of human physiology continued to prove elusive: perspiration. Now Jintu Fan and Yisong Chen of the Institute of Textiles and Clothing at Hong Kong Polytechnic University in Kowloon have developed a skin for Walter that simulates sweating. Tiny pores in the fabric covering permit the evaporation of "sweat" by transferring moisture from heated water inside the mannequin. Thanks to a convenient zipper down Walter's back, different versions of the skin can be interchanged to mimic varying rates of perspiration.

Limitations to Walter's lifelike qualities remain, however. For one, he perspires uniformly over the entire surface area of his body, in contrast to the distribution of sweat in a real person. Still, Fan says "The mannequin will also be extremely useful for better understanding the dynamics of heat and moisture transfer from the human body to the environment." Pretty smart for a dummy.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe