Sweet and Soiled Science

Limbs and hands from the northeast to the southwest

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

What makes the sap run? Because he or she wants to serve in Congress. Well, that's the first answer that springs to mind this autumn day just after the November elections, and we'll get back to that subject later. But a better answer deals with a better interpretation of the question--regarding maple syrup. That subject was also on my mind, I having recently returned from a trip to the Proctor Maple Research Center in Underhill Center, Vt., while attending the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists in Burlington.

Turns out that what makes that sap run is devilishly complex. It's so complicated, in fact, that the only way I may ever really understand it is to have the scientists who research this question write a feature article for Scientific American so I can read it.

The key point, though, is that sugar maple trees have the unusual property of producing positive internal pressure after freezing and thawing. That internal pressure can tap, I mean top, that of a car tire, reaching about 40 pounds per square inch. In order to top, I mean tap, the tree, makers of maple syrup rely on the tree tap, I mean top--the branches are really where the action takes place that ultimately brings you your favorite pancake tapping. I mean topping.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Most trees have fibers filled with water, but sugar maples have air-filled fibers. "So," explains top tap (works either way) researcher Timothy Wilmot, "instead of getting the conditions you'd expect--where freezing would cause an expansion and something would come out of the tap hole when it froze--because of the physiology of the maple wood, water is actually sucked up during the freezing period. And during the thawing period, it's pushed out."

Because making the sap run--we're still talking maple trees here--requires a series of freezes and thaws, the entire industry is dependent on temperatures oscillating between a narrow range just below and just above freezing. A growing fear in the northeastern U.S. is that sustained warming will push both that temperature range and the sugar maple range north of the freezing point and border, respectively. Indeed, the sugaring season is getting shorter in Vermont but not in Canada. Yet.

By the way, I took a break in the middle of writing this story to have pancakes and Vermont maple syrup. While eating, I read a short item in the publication Funny Times that concerned a visit to a grade school by a firefighter. He showed the students a smoke alarm and asked if they could identify it. One kid responded, "That's how Mommy knows supper is ready." Just minutes earlier I had shut off a smoke alarm to prevent the hearing damage that ordinarily accompanies my pancake cooking.

Speaking of smoke-filled rooms, back to the election. The week before the voting, a story circulated about the practice among many politicians of using liberal--even among conservatives--dollops of those syrupy hand sanitizers when they're meeting and greeting hundreds of strangers. Seemed like a good and innocuous idea, and one of the few on which George W. Bush and Al Gore publicly agree.

But New Mexico governor Bill Richardson said he found it "condescending to the voters," according to the New York Times. "I'm not afraid to get my hands dirty," Richardson said. Two stats: Richardson holds the world record for most hands shaken--13,392 in eight hours at his state fair and at the University of New Mexico in 2002; a 2005 American Society for Microbiology study of more than 6,000 subjects found that 18 percent did not wash their hands after using a public restroom. So, unless New Mexicans are unusually clean or the venues had no facilities, Richardson probably shook hands with about 2,400 could-be contaminated constituents. And he may have passed along their microbes to the washed masses. Syrupticiously.

Steve Mirsky was the winner of a Twist contest in 1962, for which he received three crayons and three pieces of construction paper. It remains his most prestigious award.

More by Steve Mirsky
Scientific American Magazine Vol 296 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Sweet and Soiled Science” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 296 No. 1 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican012007-61JxvqM2xdHRI75UY8LpCP

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe