Sweet Snacks May Slacken Stress

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Rats, like humans, love sugar. So it comes as no surprise that during two weeks of training for a recent lab experiment, the rodents queued up twice daily for small doses of sugar water. What researchers did not anticipate was the apparent effect of the sweet stuff on their stress levels: when they placed the rats in stressful circumstances at the end of those two weeks, the animals were less agitated than expected.

Multiple blood samples taken from the rats showed lower levels of stress hormones known as glucocorticoids than those that were given a saccharin solution or just plain water before being subjected to psychological or physical duress, according to research presented yesterday at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience in Washington, D.C. "We actually found that sugar snacks, not artificially sweetened snacks, are better self-medications for the two most common types of stress--psychological and physical," explains Yvonne Ulrich-Lai, a postdoctoral fellow in psychiatry at the University of Cincinnati who led the study.

Stressful events trigger the hypothalamus region of the brain, which links up with the pituitary and adrenal glands in what has been dubbed the "stress axis" to produce glucocorticoids. These stress hormones help the body defend itself under difficult conditions. But, when present in excessive quantities or for too long, they have been linked to a weakened immune system and increased abdominal fat, among other undesirable effects.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This may mean that human sugar fiends are simply warding off the sometimes overwhelming stress of modern life. "I think this research is giving us insight into something that many people may be doing already without realizing it," Ulrich-Lai says. "A lot of people when they are stressed will say that they like to eat food that tastes good." For many of us, that means sugar in its myriad forms. Yet increased sugar consumption comes with its own problems, such as weight gain. And although the rats cannily decreased their food consumption by an equivalent amount of calories when offered the sugary treat, some humans might find attaining that balance more difficult.

The ongoing research will now look at exactly how sweets decrease glucocorticoids or impact the brain and may prove that fruit or vegetables are just as effective. "I think the key is eating something you enjoy eating," Ulrich-Lai notes. But the problem may be finding something as enjoyable to eat as sugar.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe