New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Sweeter Than Cocaine

Rats prefer a sugary drink to drugs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

If the alarmingstatistics surrounding the so-called obesity epidemic have not convinced you of the dangers of a sugar-packed diet, a new study might have you thinking twice. Rats given a choice between highly sweetened water and intravenous cocaine overwhelmingly favored the tasty beverage. Their preference was just as intense whether the drink was sweetened with saccharin or sugar.

This finding, reported recently by graduate student Magalie Lenoir and her colleagues at the University of Bordeaux in France, fuels growing suspicions that for some people sweets could be as pleasurable and addictive as habit-forming drugs. As the theory goes, our hypersensitivity to sweet taste evolved when sugar was scarce and an indicator of a high-energy meal. Excessive sugar in today’s diets may overstimulate the sweet receptors in the brain, leading to a loss of self-control mechanisms and the risk of addiction.

Indeed, drugs and food activate similar reward pathways in the brain. A separate recent study showed that rats can become dependent on sugar, exhibiting typical symptoms of addiction, including craving and both behavioral and neurochemical signs of withdrawal.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The bigger surprise, notes Serge Ahmed, who designed the preference experiment, is that rats that were already experienced cocaine “users” (they had learned to self-administer cocaine) still opted for sweetened water over the drug.

Ahmed is reluctant to generalize these results to humans just yet; rather than proving that sweets are more addictive than cocaine, his team might have discovered that rats simply cannot become addicted to drugs. This explanation, Ahmed believes, would nonetheless have important implications, suggesting that researchers should focus on the prefrontal cortex and other more recently evolved brain areas found in humans and other primates.

SA Mind Vol 19 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Sweeter Than Cocaine” in SA Mind Vol. 19 No. 2 (), p. 16
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0408-16b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe