New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Swept Up in Land Mines

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Cognitive scientists don't often get a chance to save lives. This summer James Staszewski will continue to do so.

The U.S. Army originally approached Staszewski, a cognitive psychology professor at Carnegie Mellon University, eight years ago to troubleshoot the training program for personnel who would be detecting land mines in war and peacekeeping zones. Trainees had fared abysmally in exercises, catching only 10 to 20 percent of mock mines. Staszewski had been researching how people acquire exceptional memory and calculation skills. His studies upheld the idea that expertise accrues from experience, so in principle good minesweeping should be teachable. The army paired Staszewski with Vietnam War veteran Floyd “Rocky” Rockwell, who was working with a humanitarian group removing mines in war-torn countries.

Staszewski videotaped Rockwell and a protégé as they swept for dud mines on a training ground at Fort AP Hill, Va. Their detector was essentially a long stick with a magnet on the end that clicks when metal is near. Staszewski recorded the positions of the detector heads, the clicks and the men's voices as they thought out loud. Army instructions recommended sweeping the head above the ground at three feet per second, but the two experts went much slower, a foot per second, floating the detector in overlapping sweeps. Crucially, they did not just listen to clicks; they built up images in their heads of a suspected object's contours, “prospecting for familiar spatial patterns,” Staszewski says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Staszewski subsequently developed a training system to inculcate these techniques. Combat engineers who spent an extra 12 to 15 hours practicing the new method found simulated mines 85 to 95 percent of the time and detected 97 to 100 percent of defused mines. Staszewski later created a similar method for an experimental army mine detector equipped with radar. Using a more precise camera system to observe accomplished sweepers, he is currently trying to identify small differences that allow the experts to discriminate between mines and debris.

JR Minkel was a news reporter for Scientific American.

More by JR Minkel
SA Mind Vol 17 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Swept Up in Land Mines” in SA Mind Vol. 17 No. 4 (), p. 7
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0806-7b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe