New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Swiss Re

Zurich, Switzerland A top insurer highlights the dire consequences that could result from global warming

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

When one thinks of those trying to spread the word about the risks of global warming to society, one of the most reputedly staid industries probably does not leap to mind. Global reinsurer Swiss Re is looking to change that. Having long had its eye on climate change, the company cosponsored a major report, released in late 2005, high lighting the potentially disastrous economic consequences of global warming. The report notes: “Insurers and reinsurers find themselves on the front lines of this challenge since the very viability of their industry rests on the proper appreciation of risk.”

Climate change poses a special problem for the industry because it could dramatically change the rates of extreme weather events, perhaps to a point where insurers would be unable to keep up. The report, co-sponsored by the United Nations Development Program and published jointly with the Center for Health and the Global Environment at Harvard Medical School, outlines recent trends in climate and severe weather and traces the possible effects of two different climate change scenarios on prospects for heat waves and flooding, infectious and chronic disease, and managed and natural resources. Both scenarios are based on unchecked greenhouse gas emissions.

Swiss Re has a history of sensitivity to climate change concerns. In 2003 the insurer announced it was establishing a 10-year plan to become greenhouse “neutral,” meaning it would reduce or offset the net carbon emissions of its employees to zero.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Last year the company joined the Chicago Climate Exchange, a voluntary market for greenhouse gas emissions trading. With the release of its 2005 report, Swiss Re called on governments and global industry to take much stronger action to mitigate the consequences of climate change: “[L]ittle action has been taken by most governments or businesses to address the potential costs of climate change. As all insurers know, however, risk does not compliantly bow to the political or business agenda.”

JR Minkel was a news reporter for Scientific American.

More by JR Minkel
Scientific American Magazine Vol 295 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Swiss Re” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 295 No. 6 (), p. 50
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1206-50b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe