Synthetic Genes Give Cells Something to Remember

"Proof-of-principle" for synthetic biologists opens doors to myriad applications—such as monitoring the environment or the growth of tumors

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A genetic feedback loop installed in a yeast cell, the first of these circuits to be built in a eukaryotic cell—one with membrane-bound structures, such as a nucleus—may allow scientists to construct cells that can remember when they've been exposed to certain signals, a development that could one day halt the spread of cancer and better assess environmental damage.

Such a project—involving new gene construction, a predictive behavioral model, and the synthesis of their desired functions—is a major step forward for the fledgling field of synthetic biology, which seeks to better understand and co-opt the machinery of cells.

"Synthetic biology is a new area that's really exciting to young scientists—to have things begin to work in this way is a sort of validation of the field," says Pamela Silver, a professor of systems biology at Harvard University Medical School and co-author of a study demonstrating one of the first synthetic restructurings of a eukaryotic cell that is described in the journal Genes & Development. "Even though these are sort of demonstration experiments" (indicating that the technology is feasible), "they can be carried over into applications."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Among the possible applications, says Silver, would be tinkering with cells so that they can be used to assess the severity of an environmental incident, such as an oil spill, when they activate synthesized genes that respond to the presence of certain chemical. They could also be jerry-rigged to recognize and quantify the amount of DNA damage they have sustained—a development that would be helpful in preventing and combating diseases such as cancer.

Silver and her team constructed two new genes that would code for two artificial proteins designed to behave as transcription factors (proteins that control the amount of other proteins that a particular gene can make.) The genes for each transcription factor were made from different bits of DNA that code for the functional parts of proteins, such as a domain that can bind to DNA and another that provides the protein with access to the cell's nucleus.

In a nutshell, the researchers set up a system in which the yeast cell would activate the first of the implanted genes and its corresponding transcription factor (tasked with switching on the second gene) when exposed to the sugar galactose. The second gene would then manufacture its corresponding transcription factor, which was designed to bind to and ratchet up the activity of the same gene that created it.

This created a closed loop that did little to affect the normal life of the cell. Because of the looping effect that the second transcription factor had on its own gene, the second transcription factor continued to be manufactured even when galactose was eliminated from the cells' environment (thus shutting off the activity of the first gene). Silver says that this effectively sustains the memory of galactose exposure.

"Think of it as you expose the cells to something and then you take it away, but they remember that they saw it," she says. "Imagine going forward [that] you might want to build a cell that not only told you it was exposed to something but it could tell you how much or when." Silver says her lab will try to build such a cell that they can then implant into mammals to detect and report on the extent of harm caused by UV radiation, which damages DNA and is a risk factor in the development of cancer.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe