Take a Look at One of the First-Ever Climate Models in Action

Climate models have come a long way from simplistic beginnings in the 1950s

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Climate models, they just don’t make ‘em like they used to.

Of course, that may not be a bad thing. Like an Atari to an Xbox One, a Nokia brick to an iPhone 6, climate modelshave come a long way since their early predecessors. In a video recently published by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, you can see just how much of an update computer-run models have undergone from their humble beginnings in the 1950s.

The video shows one of the first global climate models ever created as it models weather in the northern hemisphere from a polar view. The grainy video and barely-there colors are a far cry from the splashy model outputs of today, but all the climate indicators you’d expect are there from the familiar—precipitation and high and low pressure systems—to the weather-nerd friendly—geopotential heights and atmospheric temperature.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Despite its simplicity, the visualization itself was no small feat. Chuck Leith, the physicist who created the model, spent time using cathode ray tubes (think back to TVs and computer monitors before the advent of flat screens) to translate the numerical information coming out of the model into something a little more engaging. In an interview with the Center for History of Physics, Leith said he worked with a Hollywood company that did movie credits to create the visualizations, which are some of the first climate and weather model visuals ever made.

And to complete the whole flashback, it’s worth considering the computing power itself. Leith’s model ran on one of the fastest computers of the day, the UNIVAC Livermore Advanced Research Computer (amazing retro photo alert). Of course what was fast in 1960 wouldn’t do you much good today: the iPhone 6 is literally a million times faster. And new computers and climate models are likely to come online in the next decade that will leave Leith’s model even further in the dust.

Don’t discount this oldie but a goodie, though. The physics in this and other early climate models inform our understanding of the planet today as well as the future impacts of climate change.

And while Leith’s model was eventually mothballed, other climate models hatched in the computing boom of the 1960s have continued to evolve and are still with us today. Efforts in the 1960s at the University of California, Los Angeles alone are responsible for eight climate models still in use today.

This article is reproduced with permission from Climate Central. The article was first published on May 19, 2015.

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe