New EPA List Points to Possible Regulations for 104 Chemicals Found in Tap Water

This is the longest list of potential contaminants ever compiled by the agency

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

U.S. EPA has found 104 chemicals that might require regulations to keep them out of tap water—the longest list of potential contaminants ever compiled by the agency.

A 1996 law requires EPA to evaluate possible tap-water pollutants every five years and make regulatory determinations for at least five of them.

The new list—the agency's third—includes pesticides, commercial chemicals, disinfection byproducts and, for the first time, pharmaceuticals.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"The thing that they did differently this time was they looked at a much bigger universe to start out with," said Mae Wu, a staff attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council. "They kind of looked at every potential chemical that could end up in drinking water. It's a lot more extensive than the first two lists."

But the agency has yet to regulate a single contaminant that has appeared on any of the lists, Wu said.

"There are some flaws in the process," she said. "They just have to make a determination on five of them. That decision can be that they're not going to do anything about it."

The agency monitors 91 contaminants in tap water, with most chosen for regulation decades ago.

EPA said it evaluated approximately 7,500 contaminants for the new list, ultimately selecting 104 chemicals and 12 microbes based on their potential to pose health risks through drinking water exposure.

The agency said it will continue to research the contaminants and will determine by 2013 whether to propose drinking water regulations for some of them.

Reprinted from Greenwire with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC. www.eenews.net, 202-628-6500

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe